Mike D - Tutors - Keystone Tutors

Unlike the majority of tutors, I am a specialist. I teach history, and only history, and my focus is on working with students working towards the highest A-level marks and applying for entry to elite universities. I have been tutoring Oxford and Cambridge entrance for history (and history with joint honours) ever since 2010. In that time, I have prepared students applying to almost every college at the two universities, and have built an unparalleled record in helping candidates to compose eye-catching personal statements, create and select high-quality written work for submission to their colleges, and then excel at interview.

In the most recent admissions cycle well over 90% of my Oxbridge students were invited to interview, and a total of 15 were offered places by Oxford or Cambridge.

I read history at Peterhouse, Cambridge, received my PhD in 1990, and since then have published seven well-received books and worked as a contributing writer in history for Smithsonian Magazine. I have helped dozens of Keystone students to meet and surpass their goals – and, just as importantly, to think about history in new and deeper ways.

Since leaving Cambridge I have spent four decades studying, writing about and teaching every period from the Roman Republic to the 1980s. For seven of those years, my day job was to commission books for Routledge's 'Macat Library' – 220 titles, to date, each contextualising, explaining and critiquing a seminal work in one of the humanities or social sciences that's frequently set to students at undergraduate level. I have a daughter who gained entry to Westminster School and graduated from Oxford in 2020 with a first in history; and every year there are always several students with whom I keep in touch, at their request, and whose university careers I follow. This means I have direct, current experience of Oxbridge entrance and the demands made of Oxbridge students. I combine all this with every tool required to research and write good history – not to mention an undimmed enthusiasm for my subject.

Age and experience play their part as well. With a Cambridge degree, a doctorate, and 40 years of serious history under my belt, I'm in the perfect position to offer practice interviews conducted by someone with the sort of mindset and gravitas of an Oxbridge don. Realistic preparation is key to success in this demanding and competitive arena, and I have a solid track record of providing exactly that. As one recent candidate reported, after the interviews were done: ''In hindsight, your practice was incredibly accurate to the interview experience. Almost every topic that they hit on was something that you'd asked me about, and they were actually less interrogative of my answers than you had been. Thank you for being so helpful!! I don't think I would've done nearly as well, or at least been as relaxed, without your instruction.''

The Oxbridge admissions system demands more of its candidates than any equivalent system in the world, but it does so for a reason. It exists to unearth young historians who can do more than merely cope with the demands of studying one subject intensively for three years. It seeks out students who have the potential to learn, in every sense of that term.

I think that both universities do a fine job of finding these students, and I do not believe their system can be ‘gamed’. Given sufficient time, it is certainly possible to draw the best out of candidates, and help them to stand out among other equally talented and hardworking people. Ultimately, however, I do this by not by teaching ‘tricks and tips,’ but by helping my students to become better historians.

For many candidates, the process starts in early summer. I have developed a broad and varied guided reading programme that introduces students to the core questions of how history can be thought about and “done” that form the basis of many Oxbridge admissions interviews. The full programme comprises 30 carefully selected advanced readings, complete with exercises and questions; candidates typically take 12-15 of these with me, two extracts at a time, but are encouraged to explore others that interest them in their own time. Overall, the readings are designed to introduce them to new ways of thinking, and to some of the fresh worlds of history that exist outside the A-level/IB curricula – from global history and the history of emotions to “history from below”. I’m especially proud of the testimonials I’ve received from students who’ve been excited and engaged by this part of the programme (below). As one parent wrote: “The school… has its limitations and cannot, and will not, go beyond a mentality of what I would describe as 'tick box teaching’. You have given her a taste of life beyond, and she has never been happier nor hungrier.''

With the disappearance of the Oxford and Cambridge written history admissions tests, many colleges have switched to making source analysis a core part of their interview processes. I work to expand my students evaluative skills well beyond what its required of them at A-level. Here, my focus is on opening a student's mind to the possibilities of what can be extracted from a text with the help of careful reading and historical imagination. I'm also very alive to how little time Oxford and Cambridge candidates have to work on their responses, and how pressured the whole assessment day can be – so I teach plenty of impactful strategies designed to make sure that candidates feel well equipped to tackle whatever it is that is thrown at them.

My general interview preparation, finally, goes well beyond this. I teach candidates how to think analytically under pressure, and use further carefully-selected readings, backed up by specially-written exercises, to discuss key concepts and controversies. Overall, the aim is to help students change their whole way of thinking and show them how they can engage with history at the deeper level that Oxford and Cambridge will demand of them.

When teaching GCSE and A-level, my approach is rather different. I still think that history is by far the most fascinating of subjects – after all, it's the story of us – and I believe success in this field is a direct consequence of engagement. My unusual background – a historian with a PhD who has also spent years as a professional journalist and full-time author – means that I'm uniquely well-qualified to spot the compelling detail, the unusual fact, and use it to open up new vistas and new approaches to history. But I also have the experience and know-how to explain the techniques of evaluation, argument and reasoning that are so critical to success at school, and I put a lot of stress on the fundamentals: effective, thought-through source analysis and well-structured, well-evidenced essays and coursework.

My main hobby is writing on a wildly diverse range of historical topics for the Smithsonian Magazine, where I am a contributing writer in history. These have ranged all the way from Roman-era slave revolts to the “toshers” – sewer-hunters – of Victorian London, all via the merchant city-states of the Swahili coast and poisoning scares in early modern Italy. I also run an award-winning history blog at mikedashhistory.com, and am a moderator and senior contributor at AskHistorians, the world's biggest and busiest online public history forum. I lecture widely and occasionally consult for and speak on a variety of historical issues for podcasts, radio and TV – everything from The Today Programme and NPR to The One Show.